QuickTake: Fifty-Five Percent of Marketplace Enrollees Turn to Others for Information or Assistance When Enrolling in a Health Plan

 

Rachel Burton, Erik Wengle, and Michael Karpman

August 21, 2018

 

The health insurance Marketplaces created by the Affordable Care Act (ACA) allow people to shop for plans that meet the ACA’s minimum essential coverage standards and allow eligible consumers to access financial assistance to lower premiums and cost-sharing requirements. The vast majority of those who buy insurance through a Marketplace (87 percent) do so with the help of advanced premium tax credits,1 which are available to people with incomes between 100 and 400 percent of the federal poverty level, or FPL ($11,880 to $47,520 for a single person);2 in 2018, people qualifying for the premium tax credit paid $77.31 per month on average for Marketplace coverage.3

 

But many consumers miss out on this financial assistance because they lack awareness or understanding of premium tax credits (Fung et al. 2017), and those who buy insurance through the Marketplace can face a complex array of options. People who shopped for Marketplace coverage for 2018 in states relying on the federal HealthCare.gov platform could choose from an average of 25 plans that varied in their benefit design, cost-sharing structures, and provider networks (ASPE 2017). The ACA requires Marketplaces to establish navigator programs to inform consumers about the availability of Marketplace coverage and assist them with enrollment, but the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) cut navigator funding for federal Marketplace states significantly for the 2018 open enrollment period. Federal funding for navigators was reduced from $62.5 million for the 2016–17 contract year to $36 million for 2017–18,4 and funding was recently cut further for the upcoming 2018–19 contract year (down to $10 million).5

 

In this QuickTake, we use data from the March 2016 and March 2018 rounds of the Urban Institute’s Health Reform Monitoring Survey (HRMS) to examine changes in consumer experiences with the Marketplaces, providing an update to previous analyses (Blavin et al. 2014; Zuckerman et al. 2014).

 

How Do Marketplace Enrollees Get Information and Assistance with Plan Selection?

 

We find that over the past two years, the way Marketplace enrollees6 shop for plans has shifted. In March 2018, most Marketplace enrollees (58.9 percent) reported using a website (such as HealthCare.gov or a state Marketplace website) the last time they looked for information on Marketplace health plans or sought assistance with enrollment, up from 45.1 percent in March 2016 (figure 1).7

 

At the same time, the share of Marketplace enrollees getting help from a call center fell substantially, from 34.0 percent of enrollees in March 2016 to 18.5 percent in March 2018. Yet the shares of enrollees getting help from insurance agents or brokers, from navigators, certified application counselors, or other similar professionals, or from state agencies, increased. This finding is consistent with a recent Urban Institute analysis of 2018 Marketplace enrollment trends in five states, which found that certified application counselors and insurance agents played an important role in helping people enroll in Marketplace coverage for 2018 (Burton et al. 2018). Other research has found that people who receive personal assistance are more likely to enroll in coverage (Collins, Gunja, and Doty 2017).

 

The most common type of in-person assistance that respondents reported receiving was from an insurance agent or broker. The share of Marketplace enrollees who reported receiving information or assistance from agents or brokers increased from 15.7 percent in March 2016 to 20.6 percent in March 2018 (figure 1). CMS has reported a similar trend based on enrollment data for the subset of states that use the federal Marketplace platform; it has found that the share of Marketplace sign-ups completed with the help of agents and brokers increased from 40 percent in 2016 to 42 percent in 2018.8 Though these trends are similar, the HRMS and CMS figures likely differ because CMS counts automatic renewals of plans that were previously purchased through agents and brokers as 2018 plan enrollments facilitated by an agent or broker; the HRMS may not capture this information. The HRMS also produces national estimates, whereas the CMS numbers only capture the experiences of the subset of states using Healthcare.gov instead of their own state-based Marketplace.

 

According to the HRMS, 10.0 percent of 2018 Marketplace enrollees nationwide reported receiving assistance from a navigator or similar professional. This is notably higher than the less than 1 percent of Marketplace enrollees CMS reports received assistance from navigators in the subset of states using the federally facilitated Marketplace.9 The HRMS likely offers a fuller picture of the share of enrollees being helped by navigators or similar professionals because the survey estimates the share of people receiving any assistance, not just help enrolling in a plan. The HRMS question does not specify the activities that navigators and other assisters can help with, but survey respondents may receive many different types of assistance. For instance, in addition to facilitating enrollment, navigators and other assisters help consumers learn about where and how to shop for plans, how to determine if they qualify for a premium tax credit, what plan attributes may be important to consider when shopping for health insurance, how to determine if their current providers and medications are covered by a plan, how to use online tools to compare plans, and how to appeal a denial of coverage.

 

Navigators are also required to help people enroll in other forms of publicly funded coverage, such as Medicaid or CHIP, if they are ineligible for Marketplace coverage. This means HRMS Marketplace enrollees who reported being helped by a navigator may have gotten help enrolling a child in CHIP, for example. (The HRMS estimates in this QuickTake do not include counts of Medicaid enrollees receiving navigator assistance because we only focus here on the experiences of Marketplace enrollees.) In contrast, CMS only counts the number of people who completed the Marketplace enrollment process with a navigator present. Some observers have also pointed out that CMS may undercount the number of people being helped by a navigator because CMS only counts an enrollment as being facilitated by a navigator if the navigator is paid (as opposed to volunteering) and if the navigator enters his or her staff identification number, which navigators are not required to do and have not been consistently trained to do.10

 

 

Taken together, more than half (54.6 percent) of adults with Marketplace coverage in March 2018 used a source of information other than a website when shopping for or enrolling in a plan. Only 39.3 percent of Marketplace enrollees used a website without any other sources of information or assistance, although this share was up substantially from 22.7 percent in March 2016 (figure 2).

 

 

How Easy Do Marketplace Enrollees Find It to Shop for and Enroll in Coverage?

 

Three-quarters (75.3 percent) of adults who were enrolled in Marketplace coverage in March 2018 reported that it was easy to get information on plans or to get help enrolling in coverage the last time they looked for information or assistance. Meanwhile, among those who looked for information but remained uninsured as of the March 2018 survey, a smaller share (58.6 percent) found these tasks easy (figure 3).

 

 

Conclusion

 

Overall, these findings suggest that consumers are increasingly enrolling in Marketplace coverage online, with 39.3 percent of Marketplace enrollees using a website and no other source the last time they looked for information or assistance. However, more than half of Marketplace enrollees still received information or some form of assistance beyond a website when navigating the plan selection and enrollment process, such as from call centers, navigators, insurance agents or brokers, or state agencies. These findings indicate that professionals in the public and private sectors who have the knowledge to guide people through the process of comparing and enrolling in plans remain an important source of information and assistance to those who use the Marketplace for obtaining health insurance, even as federal funding for Marketplace outreach and enrollment assistance has declined sharply in the past year and will decline even further for the coming open enrollment period.

 

References

 

Blavin, Fredric, Michael Karpman, and Stephen Zuckerman. “Understanding Characteristics of Likely Marketplace Enrollees and How They Choose Plans.” Health Affairs 2016: 35 (3): 535–9.

 

Blavin, Fredric, Stephen Zuckerman, and Michael Karpman. 2014. “Obtaining Information on Marketplace Health Plans: Websites Dominate but Key Groups Also Use Other Sources.” Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

 

Burton, Rachel, Rebecca Peters, Erik Wengle, Caroline Elmendorf, and Joshua Aarons. 2018. “What Explains 2018’s Marketplace Enrollment Rates?” Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

 

Collins, Sara R., Munira Z. Gunja, and Michelle M. Doty. 2017. “Following the ACA Repeal-and-Replace Effort, Where Does the U.S. Stand on Insurance Coverage? Findings from the Commonwealth Fund Affordable Care Act Tracking Survey, March-June 2017.” New York: The Commonwealth Fund.

 

Fung, Vicki, Catherine Y. Liang, Karen Donelan, Cassandra G. K. Peitzman, William H. Dow, Alan M. Zaslavsky, Bruce Fireman, Stephen F. Derose, Michael E. Chernew, Joseph P. Newhouse, and John Hsu. 2017. “Nearly One-Third of Enrollees in California’s Individual Market Missed Opportunities to Receive Financial Assistance.” Health Affairs 36 (1): 21–31.

 

ASPE (Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Department of Health and Human Services). 2017. “ASPE Research Brief: Health Plan Choice and Premiums in the 2018 Federal Health Insurance Exchange.” Washington, DC: ASPE.

 

Zuckerman, Stephen, Michael Karpman, Fredric Blavin, and Adele Shartzer. 2014. “Navigating the Marketplace: How Uninsured Adults Have Been Looking for Coverage.” Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

 

Notes


1Early 2018 Effectuated Enrollment Snapshot,” CMS, July 2, 2018. ^

 

2Eligibility for the Premium Tax Credit,” Internal Revenue Service, accessed July 3, 2018. ^

 

3Early 2018 Effectuated Enrollment Snapshot.” Marketplace premium tax credits are available to people who are not undocumented immigrants; are not eligible for Medicare, Medicaid, or other public coverage; and do not have an offer of employer-sponsored insurance that is considered affordable under the ACA. Lawfully present immigrants with incomes below 100 percent of FPL may also qualify for a premium tax credit if they are ineligible for Medicaid because of their immigration status. ^

 

4In-Person Assistance in the Health Insurance Marketplaces,” CMS, accessed July 3, 2018; Randy Pate, “Policies Related to the Navigator Program and Enrollment Education for the Upcoming Enrollment Period,” CMS, August 31, 2017; “CMS Announcement on ACA Navigator Program and Promotion for Upcoming Open Enrollment,” CMS, August 31, 2017. ^

 

5CMS Announces New Funding Opportunity Announcement for the Federally-Facilitated Exchange Navigator Program,” CMS, accessed July 11, 2018. ^

 

6 This QuickTake focuses on the experiences of all nonelderly adults with Marketplace coverage at the time of the March 2018 survey, including those who selected a plan during the 2018 open enrollment period and those who selected a plan during a prior year’s enrollment period and then automatically renewed their coverage for 2018. Though we do not observe whether adults switched plans or were automatically reenrolled, we ask whether they last looked for information or assistance before or after the 2018 open enrollment period began (November 2017). Although the sample sizes are too low to report estimates for those who last looked for information or assistance before the 2018 open enrollment period began, we generally find similar patterns in the sources of information and assistance used by these enrollees and the enrollees who looked for information or assistance after the open enrollment period began. ^

 

7 To identify likely Marketplace enrollees in the HRMS sample, we use a coverage editing process described in a previous article (Blavin, Karpman, and Zuckerman 2016). ^

 

8The Exchanges Trends Report,” CMS, accessed July 12, 2018. CMS does not clarify whether its calculation was based upon plan selections or effectuated enrollment (the latter indicating that the applicant ultimately made an actual payment toward the premium to activate enrollment). ^

 

9CMS Announces New Funding Opportunity Announcement for the Federally-Facilitated Exchange Navigator Program,” CMS, accessed July 18, 2018. ^

 

10Data Note: Further Reductions in Navigator Funding for Federal Marketplace States,” Kaiser Family Foundation, accessed July 18, 2018. ^

 

About the Series

 

This QuickTake is part of a series drawing on the HRMS, a survey of the nonelderly population that explores the value of cutting-edge Internet-based survey methods to monitor the ACA before data from federal government surveys are available. Funding for the core HRMS is provided by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the Urban Institute. The views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders. Funders do not determine research findings or the insights and recommendations of Urban experts. Further information on the Urban Institute’s funding principles is available at urban.org/fundingprinciples.

 

For more information on the HRMS and for other QuickTakes in this series, visit www.urban.org/hrms.

 

About the Authors

 

Rachel Burton is a senior research associate, Erik Wengle is a research analyst, and Michael Karpman is a research associate with the Urban Institute’s Health Policy Center. The authors gratefully acknowledge the suggestions and assistance of Linda Blumberg, John Holahan, Karen Pollitz, and Stephen Zuckerman.

 

Urban Institute Robert Wood Johnson Foundation